Two Different Forms of Management

Today, almost the whole world is ruled democratically. People agree that democracy is the best political system. In addition to this system, there are countries in the world that are not governed by many democratic systems. There are many differences between the democratic system and the non-democracy system in terms of the control of power over the people is equality, inequality in politics and freedom of expression.
Legislation, executive and judiciary, which are the cornerstones of democracy in countries governed by the democratic system, are not managed by one hand. Each of them is under the rule of more than one person, that is, under the state administration, but in countries governed by the non-democratic system, these powers are within a single person or a group. This causes the person to use these powers under their own interests and ignore the rights of others.
Secondly, in the countries governed by democracy, the people can play an active role in politics, that is, they can choose the person they want to vote and manage, but this is not the case in countries that are not governed by the democratic system. Freedom of the people in this regard is restricted.
Finally, countries governed by the democratic system enjoy freedom of expression. They can throw news headlines of any type and express everything they want freely. Countries that are not governed by the democratic system can only express their opinions on the subject that the person in charge of the administration wants with the permission of the person who is in charge of the administration.
Democracy is the most used management system, if not all over the world. People ruled by democracy are very pleased with this situation. Of course there are people who are not governed by the democratic system. What I have told are the most important differences between the democratic management system and the non-democracy management system.

Summary of the Article on the Presidential System

One of the advantages of the presidential system is that the president has more constitutional powers and is able to implement his decisions faster. This is because the executive body is dependent on direct or indirect support. You can also see this system in the Canada government. The parliamentary system allows the government to pass legislation faster and more accurately. Another reason for this to be effective is that the president does not have veto power, so that the decisions taken are made to function faster. Another advantage of this system is the equal distribution of power and authority. Government and prime minister can be changed if parliament harms the country. This ensures that the government moves away from ineffective ones and ensures the continuity of management. Continuity of the administration leads to the welfare of the people.

One of the disadvantages of the presidential system is that it can create a comfortable ground for authoritarianism. When a person is given too much authority, he / she may display authoritarian attitudes under appropriate conditions. Centralization of the authority ensures that the president makes an effective impression in every field. Especially can lower the civil participation rate, as overpowering the chairman will allow the public to be misled. In addition, the separation of power is considered a disadvantage of the presidential system, as it will drag the government into a deadlock. If the president vetoes the approved invoices, it may prevent the government from forming a new law. You can see this in 1995, when Bill Clinton chaired. The government could not reach a common opinion on any issue. Due to the obstacles to the change of president, the president’s term of office was expected to expire. The head of state and the head of government are different from each other as well as from the parliamentary system. For example, the queen cannot veto the decisions taken by the government because she does not have the rights given by the electorate. while the prime minister has a say on the government, the head of state can attend the ceremonies. It is very important to maintain this balance. The US government, is more specialized in how to act in these situations, as the government establishes balance.

Who Am I

Hello, welcome to my blog. My name is Fatmatül Zehra I am 20 years old, I am a student at Medipol University. My department is political science and international relations and I will give you information about my department in this blog. My purpose to open this blog is to share with you the curious things about political science and international relations. Now I will talk about some information about governments, regimes and systems.